Alert Me

Dalton (628)

Dalton Avatar

Posts: 10245

Joined: September 15, 2006

Last Active: May 30, 2012

Post Posted February 05, 2012

I received two brand new Gearbox Solid 1.0 170 Teardrop racquets yesterday. I restrung them both at 32lbs. One was strung with Gearbox 17 gauge multifilament and one with Gearbox 17 gauge mono premium. I played 5 games with the multi and then hit the mono between games 5 and 6. I will never play with mono again!!! The mono felt like I was hitting the ball with a wooden plank compared with the soft touch and feel of the multi string. Nuff said!
Last Message Score: 0
So Ill Rball Avatar

Posts: 10137

Joined: July 15, 2009

Last Active: April 25, 2012

Post Posted February 05, 2012

Hey,

Ya same thing for me. I am all decked out in Pro Kennex and I did that a bit ago with Pro Kennex Liquid multi and then the newer mono that Pro Kennex makes and swung one night with both. Needless to say I share the same thought as you. Never playing with mono again! Its just so much cheaper to string my racquets with mono since I am such a string breaker.
Brandon

First Last Message Score: 0

Hilario (1859)

Hilario Avatar

Posts: 10626

Joined: February 02, 2006

Last Active: May 29, 2012

Post Posted February 06, 2012

I've tried a lot of different multifilaments but I still prefer the crisp feel and response of a standard nylon monofilament. I also seem to have less problems finding my range and length in the court using a monofilament.
Hilario
Pain is temporary, honor is forever
First Last Message Score: 0

joedel (927)

joedel Avatar

Posts: 10413

Joined: June 02, 2006

Last Active: March 09, 2012

Post Posted February 06, 2012

I wouldn't string a multi and a mono at the same tension. I had a customer once come to me after restringing his racquet a couple of times with someone else.

I knocked a couple of lbs. off and the mono played well for him. In my opinion, mono is already pretty stiff and needs more slack than a multi.

I'd rather stick with multi for my own stuff.

--Joe.
--Joe Delgado
President, Enchanted Quill Press LLC
Joe's New Jersey Racquetball
http://www.eqp.com
First Last Message Score: 0

tkisling (594)

tkisling Avatar

Posts: 10295

Joined: February 01, 2006

Last Active: May 29, 2012

Post Posted February 06, 2012

Agreed. Multi all the way. It also gives the wear pattern so I can see where I'm hitting the ball as it starts to fray.

Or moreso, I should say, I have never found a mono that gave me the pop a multi will.
Fair is where they put ribbons on pigs.

"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser."- Vince Lombardi
First Last Message Score: 0

Dalton (628)

Dalton Avatar

Posts: 10245

Joined: September 15, 2006

Last Active: May 30, 2012

Post Posted February 07, 2012

joedel
I wouldn't string a multi and a mono at the same tension. I had a customer once come to me after restringing his racquet a couple of times with someone else.

I knocked a couple of lbs. off and the mono played well for him. In my opinion, mono is already pretty stiff and needs more slack than a multi.

I'd rather stick with multi for my own stuff.

--Joe.


Good point. I may give that a try but, like you, I'm definitely sticking to multi for my own gear.
First Last Message Score: 0

Hilario (1859)

Hilario Avatar

Posts: 10626

Joined: February 02, 2006

Last Active: May 29, 2012

Post Posted February 07, 2012

joedel
I wouldn't string a multi and a mono at the same tension. I had a customer once come to me after restringing his racquet a couple of times with someone else.

I knocked a couple of lbs. off and the mono played well for him. In my opinion, mono is already pretty stiff and needs more slack than a multi.

I'd rather stick with multi for my own stuff.

--Joe.
I disagree. Dynamic stiffness is the physical property of the string itself. A stiff playing string doesn't necessarily mean that it needs to be at a lower tension. Lowering tension does nothing to make a string less stiff but changes the rebound characteristics of the stringbed so that you lose more control.

In regards to tension loss not all multifilaments are the same. Monofilaments are no exception. You have to know the string you're using, specifically how stiff it is and how much tension it loses over the course of play.
Hilario
Pain is temporary, honor is forever
First Last Message Score: 0

JCamasto (798)

JCamasto Avatar

Posts: 10267

Joined: December 01, 2009

Last Active: May 30, 2012

Post Posted February 07, 2012

More string property info (graphs/lists) than you could ever want...

-Jim
First Last Message Score: 0

Hilario (1859)

Hilario Avatar

Posts: 10626

Joined: February 02, 2006

Last Active: May 29, 2012

Post Posted February 07, 2012

JCamasto
More string property info (graphs/lists) than you could ever want...

-Jim
Thanks for the link Jim. That's the data that I had in mind in my previous post.
Hilario
Pain is temporary, honor is forever
First Last Message Score: 0

joedel (927)

joedel Avatar

Posts: 10413

Joined: June 02, 2006

Last Active: March 09, 2012

Post Posted February 07, 2012

Hilario
I disagree. Dynamic stiffness is the physical property of the string itself. A stiff playing string doesn't necessarily mean that it needs to be at a lower tension. Lowering tension does nothing to make a string less stiff but changes the rebound characteristics of the stringbed so that you lose more control.

In regards to tension loss not all multifilaments are the same. Monofilaments are no exception. You have to know the string you're using, specifically how stiff it is and how much tension it loses over the course of play.


I haven't used a mono string personally. I stocked mono-kill from Ashaway (for short time) and E-Force Platinum. Mono-kill felt like chicken wire and was very hard to work with. Platinum was a little better, but has broken pretty quickly by people.

When this customer came to me with problems with another mono. I dropped the tension a bit and it worked great. Customer wasn't a hard hitter or anything just wanted the string bed to last.

I use the Gearbox Mono on a couple of frames and has worked well at lower tensions. Basically I'm afraid of people popping a string hitting too close to the frame or something.

Idk, I'll try the Gearbox mono personally and see what happens.

Later,
--Joe.

--Joe Delgado
President, Enchanted Quill Press LLC
Joe's New Jersey Racquetball
http://www.eqp.com
First Last Message Score: 0

Bryan Shaw (2643)

Bryan Shaw Avatar

Posts: 10938

Joined: February 05, 2006

Last Active: May 17, 2012

Post Posted February 10, 2012

"Mono-kill felt like chicken wire and was very hard to work with."

Have you tried the Ashaway 16g Ultrakill (black). Holy cow.
Bryan Shaw, CPA
www.pinchshot.com
First Last Message Score: 0

joedel (927)

joedel Avatar

Posts: 10413

Joined: June 02, 2006

Last Active: March 09, 2012

Post Posted February 14, 2012

Ultrakill 16g? Nope, now I'm afraid. Do you have to use pliers to bend the string into the holes?

--Joe.

--Joe Delgado
President, Enchanted Quill Press LLC
Joe's New Jersey Racquetball
http://www.eqp.com
First Last Message Score: 0

tkisling (594)

tkisling Avatar

Posts: 10295

Joined: February 01, 2006

Last Active: May 29, 2012

Post Posted February 15, 2012

some 50lb muskie line might work well in that regard too...
Fair is where they put ribbons on pigs.

"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser."- Vince Lombardi
First Message Score: 0
Alert Me